Comments on: Al Franken Wins! Again! For the Eleventyninth Time!

By: vonster

vonster — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:10:03 +0000

You are a hoot, Stoner.

By: BJ Stone

BJ Stone — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 01:17:08 +0000

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4109842,00.html

http://archive.democrats.com/display.cfm?id=181

http://www.americanpolitics.com/2001gore.html

You sure Bush won Florida? I’m not. I’m pretty sure he didn’t, as a matter of fact. But he was indeed selected, there’s no denying that. The last eight years of stupidity are proof he was indeed selected and put somewhere he shouldn’t have been.

By: vonster

vonster — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:35:35 +0000

BJ??

By: vonster

vonster — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 01:11:06 +0000

BJ?

By: vonster

vonster — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:00:20 +0000

Electoral College, BJ. Besides, I was talking bout Florida.

By: Billy Dennis

Billy Dennis — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:57:56 +0000

This scenario is not far fetched. Jeff Gordon is a good candidate for being the Anti-Christ, if you ask me. Milk-drinking planet-destroying bastard.

By: BJ Stone

BJ Stone — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:32:19 +0000

Um, Bush lost by a million votes when the whole country is considered, hence the “selected” tag.

Franken didn’t lose the vote count.

I’d say that’s a pretty significant difference, wouldn’t you?

To put it so you might understand it…Tony Stewart wins a race, Jeff Gordon finishes second by several hundred feet. Under the Franken scenario, Tony Stewart wins. Under the 2000 Bush scenario, Jeff Gordon is selected as the winner and Tony Stewart grows a beard and starts making documentaries to save the planet while Gordon does his best to destroy said planet.

By: vonster

vonster — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:55:40 +0000

Bush is ahead by a small margin, Gore wants to fight in court, Supreme Court says no you lost, Bush was SELECTED.

Same thing happens with the tables reversed and the Democrat WON!

Nice double standard.